>-----Original Message----- >From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:18 PM >To: 'Chris Santerre' >Subject: RE: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 3:17 PM >> To: 'Kang , Joseph S.'; Spamassassin-Users >> (users@spamassassin.apache.org) >> Subject: RE: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM > >> *snip* >> >> "Totals: 227.6MB of spam in roughly 19,000 messages. 61.8MB >> of viruses in roughly 3500 messages." >> >> He don't get much spam! I thought I was on the low side, but >> this number seems really low for the timeline. I think a few >> people on the list do this in an hour :) >> >> Hardly enough to measure the spam level of the Interweb. > >True. > >But it is interesting to see where the dots go from relatively spare in >location to a near-giant blue splotch. > >Ha! >
After looking at it longer, I find the size interesting. *giggle* Seems the size has dropped. Which makes sense seeing as they are trying to give us less to filter on. Now with SURBL they can't even put a simple linked gif file. In the last 2 days I've seen a flood of empty spams. Perhaps they are just following the slope? :) --Chris