Robert Menschel wrote: > The rules files to drop entirely are mentioned in Dan's > notice. I assume you got those. > > We've reviewed the SARE files, and identified all other rules > that overlap with 3.0.0, and have migrated them to new files. > For instance, see http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#header > > 70_sare_header_x30.cf contains those rule(s) which duplicate > 3.0, and should not be used with that version. > > 70_sare_header_x264_x30.cf contains those rule(s) which > duplicate both 3.0 and 2.64, and should not be used with > either of those versions. > > If we've done it correctly, even if you include those files > in your system you /should/ be OK, since we coded these files > to give preference to the 2.64 and/or 3.0 rules. There should > be no harm in including those files, other than increased > overhead, but it's better for 3.0 installations to avoid the > x30 files. > > Bob Menschel
Bob Thanks for the clarification :) Michele Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd Hosting, co-location & domains http://www.blacknight.ie/ Tel. +353 59 9137101 -- Email scanned by Blacknight for viruses and dangerous content. Visit http://www.blacknight.ie for more information
