----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Goods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Sandy S'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: {Spam?} Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> Sandy S scribbled on Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:52 AM:
>
> > I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am
> > currently running
> > my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had
> > an email slip
> > through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's
> > listed in all of the URI blacklists.
>
> <*snip*>
>
> >
> > In this case it correctly extracted the domain to query as
> > bestwneiis.info.
> >
> > Is this a bug or is there something I missed as I was
> > RTFMing? Thanks for
> > any help on this!
> >
> > Sandy S.
>
> Sandy,
> Can't help with your original problem without more info but Ulysses did
> point out another problem and I see the same here. You are listed with
three
> URI's I use. You may want to find out why. I had to retrieve this post
from
> my spam box. If Ulysses hadn't responded, I would have never seen this.
> Here's the header of your message on my box.
>
> From: "Sandy S" <sandys-munged-boreal.org>
---snip----
Ken -
I quoted the missed URI in my original message, and it appears that's what
triggered the URI_RBL rules on yours and Ulysses' systems. (Just not on
mine!) :-(
I did double-check our domain and it's not listed, but thanks for the
heads-up!
Sandy
