That's definitely not the case with our systems:

----example----
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.9 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
        HTML_MESSAGE,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham 
        version=3.0.1-prforsa3.0.0
----end ex----

Something seems a bit fishy there.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 1:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SOLVED [Re: Reading, but not loading SQL userprefs (SA3.0.1 & Exim
4.43)]

Figured it out.

It seems that SA doesn't apply whitelist scores unless the rest of the
scores add up to be greater than the score required to trigger
X-Spam-Status: Yes.

This seems to be a rather odd methodology.  What's the rationale behind not
taking into consideration whitelist scores regardless of the spam score?

On 8-Nov-04, at 10:28 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:

> I've got a whitelist_from in my SQL DB which Spamassassin is supposed 
> to read in.  When I do a debug of spamd, I can see the connection to 
> the DB as the user, but the whitelist_from doesn't seem to be getting 
> applied to the message:
>
> mysql> select * from spamassassin.userpref;
> +------------------+-------------------------+--------------------
> +--------+
> | username         | preference              | value              |  
> prefid |
> +------------------+-------------------------+--------------------
> +--------+
> | $GLOBAL          | whitelist_from          | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |     
>  36 |
> | jason.lixfeld.ca | whitelist_from          | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |     
>  35 |
> | $GLOBAL          | score USER_IN_WHITELIST | -10                |     
>  23 |
> +------------------+-------------------------+--------------------
> +--------+
> 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>
> Below is the output of spamd in debug mode.  Spamd is called twice for  
> this message.  First to obtain the $spam_score and $spam_score_int   
> for data checking:


Reply via email to