Mathias Koerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In what way?
Reply to mailing list messages. > But that also wants to consider M-IDs of mails received and listed > as non-spam. IMHO, a more restrictive set (only M-IDs sent from the > local site are checked against) would be better and much harder > to defeat. Any other mails would have to pass other tests anyway. The code just predates our ability to figure out local site messages (via the ALL_TRUSTED rule), I'd use ALL_TRUSTED today. > Why? That way I can strongly identify users I know would not spam.. Users of PGP are not the same set of people getting their mail occasionally flagged as false positives. -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
