Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
This actually sounds like it would be a good public DNSBL. Rather than have everyone fingerprint, the central DNSBL would perform fingerprinting of IPs that are requested and not in the cache, then cache the results.
Otherwise, everyone running the fingerprints could add up to a good amount of traffic.
... especially on spammers' connections. :)
The only problem with having a central fingerprint server would be DoS attacks by the spammers.
- Joe
