On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 9:57:28 PM, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 1:14:33 PM, Mark Mark wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: donderdag 2 december 2004 21:56 >>> To: 'Mark'; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail) >>> Subject: RE: What is up with surbl.org? >>> >>> > How come surbl.org has a "Bad" status at rating.cloudmark.com? (see >>> > below). This is not good.
>>> Perhaps Jeff should contact them with a "What up, dude?" email? >> Perhaps he should. Seriously, I heavily rely on the rating.cloudmark.com >> data; surbl.org should *never* have been in there. The folks at cloudmark >> really need to manually inspect their entries; next thing this list has a >> bad rep too. > Hi Mark, > I've not familiar with Cloudmark. Would you mind contacting them > for us, with some of the possible explanations why they probably > have an error, as already mentioned here? FWIW I tried to send a note to Vipul. No idea if he will get it. Mark, it could still help if you contact Cloudmark for us, since you're a customer of theirs and familiar with the issues. FWIW I can't email you: > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (reason: 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Cloudmark Status of MAIL FROM > Domain [surbl.org]: Bad) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > ... while talking to mail.asarian-host.net.: >>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1648 > <<< 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Cloudmark Status of MAIL FROM Domain > [surbl.org]: Bad > 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
