On Friday, December 10, 2004, 1:21:19 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: > Hello Loren,
> Friday, December 10, 2004, 10:33:02 AM, you wrote: >>> > Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML >>> > part, and this was the plain text part: >>> > "Get a capable html e-mailer" >>> ... >>> I've seen this mentioned a couple of times recently. If it's really >>> diagnostic of spamware - which it probably is - it might not hurt to write >>> a rule for it. LW>> You mean something like this? Works like a charm. > Agreed. Hope to have my own mass-check results of this shortly (my > version is slightly different from yours). Looks real useful so far. > Bob Menschel But "Get a capable html e-mailer" could also be generic text for non-MIME or non-HTML capable mail clients to see. It's highly lame (especially when messages should be in plain text IMO), but it could appear in hams. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
