From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for users who have
> their own local rules?  Just curious as to what problem?
> 
> --Chris

I have not migrated Loren over to the new machine because there is a
problem HERE with spamd. I set it down to only allow one client to
make the problem more obvious.

I have local.cf allowing user rules as well as user scores. I have
my own set of local rules and Loren has his, which he uses while
testing rules before they become SARE rules. So we each need our
own cache of personal rules.

The first time I use spamc to scan a message all is just fine. My
rules and scores trigger properly.

The SECOND time I use spamc (actually the second trip through
the same spamd when multiple spamd's are running) still sees
the message triggering on my rules. But every one of my rule's
scores were arbitrarily set to one rather than the score in my 
.spamassassin/user_prefs file. This drove me nuts finding it.
No, it drove me over the edge. I was using "language that would
make a sailor blush". He**, it would even have made a hockey
player blush and get sent to the showers with an order to wash
his mouth out with soap.

I am running through postfix and procmail without the postfix
being in its little jail. (If in its jail how would the procmail
be able to fire off with MY rules? Maybe that's not a worry. But
that is another problem. I tested this with "spamc" directly
"spamc <test_message" and saw the effect that way. So it's not
in the postfix or procmail part of the chain.)

{O.O}

Reply via email to