same here. On 10 Jan 2005 at 7:45, Nichols, William wrote:
> I will be sticking with 2.64 for a while as well. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:42 AM > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: maintaining the 2.6 branch > > Another reason.... > > I've been doing some testing ove the last couple of days with 3.02 and > found it's scores are way lower on all test emails than 2.64. (anywhere > upto 33% lower in limited tests). > > I've managed to get most of my 2.64 rules etc over (along with bayes), > but I'm nervous about switching given the amount of spam 2.64 IS > catching vs 3.02 MIGHT miss. > > Alot of the defaults rules have reduced scores (esp when running > bayes+net combination) and I don't want to give my users the spam. > > I've seen several other people that complain/note this issue as well so > it seems I'm not alone on this. > > I shall be sticking to 2.64 for the forsee-able future as 3.02 gives me > no advantage and quite a high likelihood of more spam dropping through > the system! >
