Thanks all. I did think SURBL was enabled but obviously it isn't. Loren: I will also have a look at additional rules that I may have missed.
Thanks again. Daz > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 January 2005 12:08 > To: Spamassassin > Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of > RulesEmp rules > > On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:20:17 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'm running the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.0.2), with a healthy > > Bayes database (I believe) and pretty much all of the available rules > > from rulesemporium.com and I have noticed recently, particularly from > > comments from my users, that SA is missing a lot of clear spasm. > > > I have attached one for reference which scored only 4.0 on my system > > despite having clear, unobfuscated references to two notable erectile > > dysfunction drugs. > > > Can anyone tell me where I'm going wrong with this? > > > Thanks, > > > Darren > > Try installing a current Net::DNS and enabling network tests. > SURBL and other URIBL rules triggered on the URIs in > your spam: > > URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL > > Those should be plenty to get them marked as spam. > > Jeff C. > -- > Jeff Chan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.surbl.org/
