Help... I need to feed spam and ham to sa-learn. We are using lotus notes R5 and I need to get the messages into a format that sa-learn can use. The closest I have found is to export messages as "structured text", and this exports multiple messages as one file, the example below is how they are exported... Is this usable by sa-learn? Any suggestions? Thanks for the advice.
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009223223:23490 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:32 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 110623455278; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:32 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id 01B1A11447; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D786E1146A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:30 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 19329 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:22:09 -0000 Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:22:08 -0000 X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.lastar.com (HELO server11.lastar.com) (65.89.139.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:22:06 -0800 Received: from spamfilter.lastar.com ([192.168.70.12]) by server11.lastar.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005012010220301455 for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamfilter.lastar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9845CEFCE4 for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from spamfilter.lastar.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spamfilter [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31569-10 for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from server24.ctg.com (server24.ctg.com [192.168.74.10]) by spamfilter.lastar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58550EFCE0 for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 (EST) X_MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 MIME_Version: 1.0 Subject: Testing a message PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:22:02 AM $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X_MS_Has_Attach: X_MS_TNEF_Correlator: Thread_Topic: Testing a message Thread_Index: AcT/A8r1xq4Lq9KHR4yEJ+GLien6cQ== From: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SendTo: "SPAMASSASSIN" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> X_Virus_Scanned: amavisd-new at lastar.com X_Virus_Checked: Checked X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM-01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM Greetings! I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running) A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to sa-learn and learned it as ham. I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up. What is the best way of accomplishing this? Jason Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009323090:24101 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235150878; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id AE2DD11480; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F3E11447 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:28:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:26:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (hermes.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.4.36]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j0KFQdUJ001781; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:26:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from [134.130.4.36] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.2-1) with ESMTP id j0KFHElg012554; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:20:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.130]) by hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.2-1) with ESMTP id j0KFHBle012550 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from circe (circe.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.36]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay2.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.6]) by circe (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.18]) by relay2.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j0KFH7st023252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from isop10 (velvet.isolution.nl [194.109.164.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0KFH715004012 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:07 +0100 (CET envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:16:57 AM Principal: "Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Variable names From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SendTo: "[procmail]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Errors_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Chaos rules. MIME_Version: 1.0 X_MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 $Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 DeliveryPriority: N X_MSMail_Priority: Normal Precedence: list X_BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X_Virus_Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X_Mailman_Version: 2.1.5 list_post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List_Subscribe: <http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List_Archive: <http://mailman.RWTH-Aachen.de/pipermail/procmail> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List_Id: discussion of the procmail program <procmail.lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:32:30 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:32:30 AM-01/20/2005 09:32:31 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:32:31 AM Toen wij NM Public kietelden, kwam er dit uit: > Does anyone know if there are any > conventions for naming user-defined procmail variables? I (try to) follow a namespace-approach. Inside abc.inc I use abc_Varname for variables. At the end of abc.inc I (should) unset all variables that have no business outside abc.inc. I sometimes used double underscore for locals, so abc__Varname, but than an abc_Varname could also exist and that would be a new source of problems. An alternative would be abc_LOC_Varname. Inside .procmailrc, the special 'PM_' prefix could be chosen. And 'H_' for values derived from Headers, 'B_' for body-vars, 'G_' for common globals. Some often used variables should stay as they are, like SPC, TAB, WSP (the one without []), NL, and such. > Or for > user-defined variables in the Unix world in general? Both perl and PHP have namespaces. That helps a lot. In a new procmail, we could have real namespaces, like namespace.Varname. And multiple matches, like MATCH1.. MATCHn. And, and, ... -- Grtz, Ruud ____________________________________________________________ procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009333540:24187 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:35 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235214958; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:34 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id D720B11481; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E49C811485 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:33 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 54834 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:33:25 -0000 Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 54818 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:33:25 -0000 X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:33:23 -0800 Received: from mk.comcast.net (pcp0010744015pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net[69.243.87.84]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <200501201533200130090j09e>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:33:21 +0000 $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:33:22 AM SendTo: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"SPAMASSASSIN" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Testing a message In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME_Version: 1.0 X_Virus_Checked: Checked X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM-01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM At 10:22 AM 1/20/2005, Jason Gauthier wrote: > I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running) >A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to >sa-learn and learned it as ham. > >I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up. >What is the best way of accomplishing this? pipe it through the spamassassin command line: spamassassin <message.txt Optionaly you can add the -t parameter to force SA to generate a spam report, even if it's below the threshold (helpful to see all the rules). Note: Make sure that sa-learn and spamassassin are being run as the same user than amavis will access spamassassin as. Otherwise you might be using a different bayes database (They default to being in $HOME) Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009345142:24260 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:51 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235291367; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:51 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id 44B3711481; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C2DE11457 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:50 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 58916 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0000 Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 58903 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0000 X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:34:38 -0800 Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (webmail7.xs4all.nl [194.109.22.167]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0KFYXd5063471; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:34:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from 80.127.176.177 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:34:34 +0100 (CET) $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:34 AM Subject: Re: Testing a message From: "Menno van Bennekom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SendTo: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CopyTo: "SPAMASSASSIN" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> ReplyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User_Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a $Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME_Version: 1.0 X_Virus_Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X_Virus_Checked: Checked X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM-01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM > Greetings! > > I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running) > A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to > sa-learn and learned it as ham. > > I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up. > What is the best way of accomplishing this? > > Jason You probably did something like 'cat message | sa-learn --ham' to learn it as ham. Like that you can do 'cat message | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to send it again. Or you can do 'cat message | spamassassin -D' to just evaluate what spamassassin would have done with the message. Menno van Bennekom Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009351447:24295 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:14 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235314196; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:14 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id 121DD11460; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E7011440 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:12 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 59655 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:45 -0000 Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 59591 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:44 -0000 Delivered_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 59459 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:43 -0000 X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.198.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:34:43 -0800 Received: from mk.comcast.net (pcp0010744015pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net[69.243.87.84]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005012015343501500d5spde>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:34:41 +0000 $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:38 AM SendTo: "Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 child processes In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] t> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME_Version: 1.0 X_Virus_Checked: Checked X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM-01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM At 06:58 AM 1/20/2005, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: >Is there a way to limit spamd child processes? > ># ps -ef | grep spam > >root 602 1 0 13:28 ? 00:00:12 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H >xadmin 649 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:09 spamd child >xadmin 650 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:07 spamd child >xadmin 651 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:13 spamd child >root 652 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:10 spamd child >root 653 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:08 spamd child Yes, with the -m parameter you are already using. You've got -m5, spamd has 5 children.. set it to -m2 and you'll get 2. Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2005012009354443:24330 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:44 -0600 Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1 (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235344541; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:44 -0600 Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id 63A2811457; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5DDF1148D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:34 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 60113 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:49 -0000 Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 59968 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:47 -0000 Delivered_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 59936 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:47 -0000 X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org Received_SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mailgate1.dslextreme.com (HELO mailgate1.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:34:45 -0800 Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.93]) by mailgate1.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 80D59630309 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1604 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO espphotography.dslextreme.com) (66.245.217.196) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:34:42 -0800 $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:36 AM SendTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Testing a message In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME_Version: 1.0 X_DSLExtreme_MailGate_Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X_DSLExtreme_MailGate: Found to be clean X_MailScanner_From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X_Virus_Checked: Checked X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pfbspmp1.transplace.com X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X_Spam_Level: $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $UpdatedBy: $Orig: Categories: $Revisions: RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM-01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM $MsgTrackFlags: 0 DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM At 07:22 AM 1/20/2005, you wrote: >Greetings! > > I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running) >A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to >sa-learn and learned it as ham. > >I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up. >What is the best way of accomplishing this? Someone will I'm sure correct me if I'm wrong... but back when I was a geek in training, I could save the message to a file, and run spamassassin < filename1 > filename2 where filename1 was the original file, filename2 is the output file that SA would create with the new score. This may have changed... Evan ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** Thanks, Kyle Reynolds 972-731-4731 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
