>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:56 AM
>To: SPAMASSASSIN
>Subject: Help analyzing the determination of spam
>
>
>Nice subject!
>
>I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam
>score.
>When I run the message through spamassassin -t it gets a spam 
>score as I
>would expect.
>
>I know I don't have much more details, but can anyone give me 
>ideas why?
>
>
>
>Content analysis details:   (2.7 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name              description
>---- ----------------------
>--------------------------------------------------
>-2.8 ALL_TRUSTED            Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
> 0.2 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04    BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
>area
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above
>50%
>                            [cf: 100]
> 1.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> 0.1 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
> 0.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL         Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL
>blocklist

You can change the above score to 2.0 without any problems. Many raise it to
3.0. 

--Chris 

Reply via email to