>-----Original Message----- >From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:09 PM >To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn >Cc: Daniel Quinlan; users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: SPEWS still sucks > > >Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully >> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for >> people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do. > >Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly mass-check >results for SURBL: > >OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 217996 164295 53701 0.754 0.00 0.00 (all messages) >100.000 75.3661 24.6339 0.754 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) > 11.644 15.4490 0.0037 1.000 0.98 3.90 URIBL_SC_SURBL > 39.572 52.4976 0.0261 1.000 0.98 3.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL > 51.955 68.9236 0.0391 0.999 0.96 2.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL > 5.690 7.5492 0.0000 1.000 0.95 2.01 URIBL_AB_SURBL > 53.948 71.5238 0.1769 0.998 0.83 0.54 URIBL_WS_SURBL
Why is the WS FP rate still that high? Yes it catches the most spam, but please please please report ANY FPs you get right away. It needs to be under .10 in my mind. If we don't do this soon, I will start taking plates of nachos hostage. You don't want to know what I'll do to them!! --Chris (mmmmm salsa.......)
