From: "Don Levey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Rob McEwen wrote: > > Jdow said: > >>> "I have found, in general, that whitelisting mailing lists > >>> is not a very good idea" ... "I also find spams appear > >>> on unmoderated Yahoo Groups." ... "a blanket white list of > >>> the sort you propose would likely turn me white with anger"... > > > > Thanks for the reply... but that is why I said in my original post: > > > >>> "but without whitelisting other real spam" > > > > Also, I'm more worried about SURBL (& other URI checker) hits on > > these than rules hits. > > > > Still, do you find such spam coming from those lists which are 100% > > opt-in? If Yahoo 100% opt-in? > > > I am a member of quite a few Yahoo groups. They all seem to be opt-in only, > but the problem is that even with the moderated groups the larger ones > occasionally admit spammers. Thus I do get real spam from some of these > groups. Likewise, messages are tagged as spam which aren't, due to their > originating IP.
Ahhhhummm not much can be done about originating IP. Although I have found that by and large the groups I prefer to be in don't seem to have any originating IP problems. Of course, I do not use the black hole lists on any of the headers. So don't have that as a problem source. (I philosophically abhor them as a concept, especially the ones that black hole more than the originating address. Punishing innocents is not a way to stop spam. Er, find the spammers and bust their kneecaps or something else equally nasty until they get the idea, "Stop Spamming.") (BTW - since this thread started spam incoming to my address has gone up dramatically. None of it's getting through. So you spammers out there trying so hard - give it up. It's not working. {^,-}) {^_^} Joanne