>-----Original Message----- >From: George Georgalis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 1:10 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: [SARE] Rules updates: URI > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: George Georgalis >>>Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 10:15 AM >>>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >>>Subject: Re: [SARE] Rules updates: URI >> >>Regarding the comment on too much disclosure in the logs, there is >>nothing keeping spammers from diff-ing the cf files, I would refer >>to the quote "Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already >>know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds >>of roguery." http://www.deter.com/unix/papers/treatise_locks.html >>Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, 1853 (excerpt) -- >>Charles Tomlinson > >On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:37:16AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote: >> >>Actually we've done a little research on this. While I won't >go into detail, >>I'll just say that while they could do a diff, they don't. >> >>The one good thing about spammers is, There is no honor among >thieves. ;) >> > >yeah, it kinda kills a lot of conspiracy theories. > >But, in the context of publishing SA change logs, what is your point? >Is there any reason not to publish which rules have changed? >
Which rules have changed, no. Not so much. But it looked like you wanted to go further into detail on exact changes. More like exactly what they are looking for. We have to keep a fine balance. --Chris
