RE: Porno

[Gary W. Smith]

Title: Re: Porno

Okay, SA is working but was about the routing.  Did it ever pass through SA?  Were there SA headers in the original message?  Did SA timeout because the machine is overloaded and just return the original email back to the MTA chain?

 

Granted SA thinks its spam but did SA ever get a chance to see it?

 

Gary

---

From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 2/23/2005 7:04 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Porno

Yes, I got a hold of one and it score 24 points using 'spamassassin -t'
and considered spam as only 5 points were required, but ended up in my
inbox. I am running amavisd-new with Postfix, how do I tell if
spamassassin is even working?


Gary W. Smith wrote:

>You might want to collect some additional information from the client
>such as the headers.  This is where I would start. 
>
>Gary
>
> 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:54 AM
>>To: SpamAssassin
>>Subject: Porno
>>
>>I have received complaints from two companies since yesterday about
>>messages with porno content getting through. Is this a new variant?
>>   
>>
>And
> 
>
>>is anyone else getting hit with these or know of any updates to filter
>>the messages? I am running Spamassassin 3.0.1 with rules du jour, but
>>neither seem to pick them up.
>>   
>>