Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Alan Shine wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.
>>
>> 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the
>> message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?
>See: http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/
>Since the entire system is released under the GPL, people are free to
>host their own independent servers. Server peering is planned for a
>future release.
What I meant in my first question is:dnsrbld can import localy the zone files - via rsync,can pyzord do the same? - I already understood that pyzord can be installed any where, but can it import the signature files localy?
>> 2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only
>> SARE rules).
>> We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor.
>> My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA,
>> that will result in better spam identification, and that will cost the
>> lowest in performance time?
>Probably SURBL but if you are going to enable network tests it is best
>to have as many activated as possible from the start.
>http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
