Jeff Chan wrote: >Perhaps DCC took these out. Please ask Pyzor to do the same. > >
DCC doesn't do removal.. Theoretically, it's correct for DCC to list this newsletter. DCC is technically a measure of "bulk" not "spam". However, in the past most users of DCC reported mostly spam, making it's reports rather useful. Recently I've noticed DCC is living up to it's design much more than SA's use of it. It lists bulk mail. Subscriber newsletters, spam, large mailing lists, it gets them all. I've had to hack DCC down to 1.0 for this reason. While "bulk of distribution" is still a reasonable test to use with a marginal score, it's no longer reasonable to use it for much more than 1.0 IMHO. As for pyzor, that's strange. Pyzor is supposed to be spam-only. Sounds like somebody, or probably many somebodies, have a "spamtrap" that reports everything sent to it to pyzor, and that "spamtrap" is an old employee's mail account which is still subscribed to the newsletter.
