Thanks for your tips. I will try some of them.

I think Im crazy but here what I seem to have notice which I know does not
make sense.

When I set up the rule and then send mail from Pine to myself it seems to
catch it. But when real spam comes in it does not catch it.
This I know does not make sense and I must be doing something wrong but
below I have cut and pasted the two email addresses from the headers to show
you that they are exact in nature.
Mine from Pine:
To: Joe Blow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>From spam.
To: Leland Brant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Catches mail sent from pine but not from outside.
Am I nuts or what ??


"Brian R. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S Semple wrote:
> > I have email coming to me in the following way.
> > To: Fake Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > In other words it has two words before the email address. Eventually I
will make it so it searches the prefix name for letters not found in my
name. However to start I just wanted to see if I could find two words before
the email address. All reasoning tells me that the following should work but
it does not. Im stumpted. The name has a space as indicated in my example.
> >
> > header   CM_BAD_NAM_PREFIX To =~ /[[:alnum:]]{1,10} [[:alpha:]]{1,10}
(<name\@(domain|domain2))\.COM>/i
> >
> > I have found that /[[:alpha:]]+ (<name\@(domain|domain2))\.COM>/i
> > finds :
> > To: Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I thought searches didn't need to be anchored.
> >
> > Any advice.
> >
> >
> Try replacing the literal spaces with \s+  also, the < and > should be
> followed by ? as they will not always be there.
>
> In any case, it won't necessarily work, as the display name is
> controlled by the senders mail client, and they can call you anything
> they want.  If, for instance, I have you in my work address book, the
> display name would be "Steve Semple (email)" were I to send you email.
>
> -- 
> Brian R. Jones
> Ob.  tagline:
>          "I never follow the herd.
>                  Even when it's going the right direction."
>



Reply via email to