Hehe, yeah, (?>) is atomic grouping ;)
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:21:57PM -0400, Keith Ivey wrote: > Rocky Olsen wrote: > >no, possessive quantifiers/atomic grouping discard saved states to back > >tracking will not occur for what was matched. > > Sounds like you might be able to use (?>pattern) to do what you want. > See perldoc perlre. > > -- > Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Washington, DC -- ______________________________________________________________________ what's with today, today? Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: http://rocky.mindphone.org/rocky_mindphone.org.gpg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
