M>-----Original Message----- M>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M>Sent: 14 May 2005 18:37 M>To: Dan Simmons M>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org M>Subject: Re: {SPAM} Drug SPAM problem..any fixes? M> M>Dan Simmons wrote: M>> Hi All, M>> M>> I am having an issue with the following DRUG related spam. Does M>> anyone have any rules to catch this? M>> M>> Environment: SA 3.0.2 with network tests and the following M>SARE rule sets: M><snip> M>> X-SA-SysThreshold: 6.0 M>> 0.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with M>1600-2000 bytes of words M>> 0.1 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML M>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message M>> M> M>For your message I got the following (SA 2.64 with Mail::SpamCopURI) M> M>SpamAssassin (score=7.908, required 5, AB_URI_RBL M>1.00, BAYES_00 -4.90, M>BLACK_URI_RBL 2.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST 1.51, M>INFO_GREYLIST_NOTDELAYED -0.00, JP_URI_RBL 1.00, OB_URI_RBL M>2.10, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, WS_URI_RBL 2.10) M> M>Most of that is URI blacklists from surbl (supported by SA M>3.x by default), as well as uribl.com (not supported in M>default config but I added it by hand) M>
Trouble is with the SURBL is that you can receive a lot of these spams before they get listed, they also seem to change domain name twice a day or more to keep ahead of the listing, that's why I wanted something to block them if they don't hit any black lists. Martin