M>-----Original Message-----
M>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
M>Sent: 14 May 2005 18:37
M>To: Dan Simmons
M>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
M>Subject: Re: {SPAM} Drug SPAM problem..any fixes?
M>
M>Dan Simmons wrote:
M>> Hi All,
M>> 
M>> I am having an issue with the following DRUG related spam.  Does 
M>> anyone have any rules to catch this?
M>> 
M>> Environment: SA 3.0.2 with network tests and the following 
M>SARE rule sets:
M><snip>
M>> X-SA-SysThreshold: 6.0
M>>     0.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 
M>1600-2000 bytes of words
M>>     0.1 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
M>>     0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
M>> 
M>
M>For your message I got the following (SA 2.64 with Mail::SpamCopURI)
M>
M>SpamAssassin (score=7.908, required 5,        AB_URI_RBL 
M>1.00, BAYES_00 -4.90,
M>BLACK_URI_RBL 2.00,   HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST 1.51,
M>INFO_GREYLIST_NOTDELAYED -0.00, JP_URI_RBL 1.00, OB_URI_RBL 
M>2.10, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, WS_URI_RBL 2.10)
M>
M>Most of that is URI blacklists from surbl (supported by SA 
M>3.x by default), as well as uribl.com (not supported in 
M>default config but I added it by hand)
M>

Trouble is with the SURBL is that you can receive a lot of these spams
before they get listed, they also seem to change domain name twice a day or
more to keep ahead of the listing, that's why I wanted something to block
them if they don't hit any black lists.

Martin

Reply via email to