Hi David, A few quick tips to help performance... David Velásquez Restrepo said: SNIP
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf Do not, I repeat do not use this file, it grew way to big. This type of test is better handled by SURBL. > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf If you are running => SA 3.0.0 antidrug is builtin to SA > http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current > http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf Might want to drop these as well in favor of SURBL tests, at least the uri version. > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/99_sare_fraud_pre25x.cf Depending on your SA version run only one of the above rulesets. > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/72_sare_bml_post25x.cf > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/71_sare_bml_pre25x.cf Depending on your SA version run only one of the above rulesets. > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/71_sare_redirect_pre3.0.0.cf > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf Depending on your SA version run only one of the above rulesets. SNIP Are you running a caching DNS server? A caching nameserver will help quite a bit with the net tests. > So, here it goes again the "simple", but not short, question: > Q) With spamassassin (and all the above info) you need about 20 to 30 > seconds per email message and LOTS of RAM and CPU: > a) TRUE > b) FALSE Correct the above items and see how it runs after the changes. Cheers, matt