He's on a machine I administer. I have a "thing" about autolearn.
I don't do it. So this is not a problem for Loren. (It's too big
a pain to repair a self-mis-trained bayes database. So the neat
selectively trained bayes databases we have work quite nicely as
a result.) I cannot see the long term utility of autolearn whereas
I can see its long term futility.
{^_-}
From: "mizzio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Loren,
>
> it works:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-56.2 required=4.5
> X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST_SA SA List 2.4 BAYES_50
> BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4439]
>
>
> One more question: I understand that in this way the mail are never
> marked at spam, but they are autolearned by the system.
> Is this correct ?
>
> Thank you,
> Maurizio
>
>
> Il giorno mar, 24-05-2005 alle 05:21 -0700, Loren Wilton ha scritto:
> > header WHITELIST_SA List-Id =~
> > /(?:dev|users)\.spamassassin\.apache\.org/i
> > describe WHITELIST_SA SA List
> > score WHITELIST_SA -100
