spamd -L
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neal Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 2005 June, 16, Thursday 19:09
Subject: spamc -L ?> There is spamassassin -L, but not spamc -L. Why not? I want to use with > kmail, and spamc (with network check) is too slow on my home machine. > spamassassin -L is OK, but woundn't a spamc -L be faster since it avoids > startup cost?
