On Monday, July 25, 2005, 3:11:40 PM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
> this is what it took to make it work for me
> _urirhssub_ URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A 127.0.0.2
> body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags URIBL_SC2_SURBL net
> score URIBL_SC2_SURBL 3.0
> _urirhssub_ URIBL_XS_SURBL xs.surbl.org. A 127.0.0.2
> body URIBL_XS_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_XS_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_XS_SURBL Has URI in XS - Testing
> tflags URIBL_XS_SURBL net
> score URIBL_XS_SURBL 2.0
That will work, but it's technically incorrect since the
standalone lists sc2 and xs aren't bitmask-encoded, which is what
urirhssub is intended for. Standalone lists should be used with
urirhsbl, so correct, working rules for these are:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
tflags URIBL_SC2_SURBL net
score URIBL_SC2_SURBL 3.0
urirhsbl URIBL_XS_SURBL xs.surbl.org. A
body URIBL_XS_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_XS_SURBL')
describe URIBL_XS_SURBL Has URI in XS - Testing
tflags URIBL_XS_SURBL net
score URIBL_XS_SURBL 2.0
Please give them a try and let us know how they work for you.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
