From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> jdow writes:
> > From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Do you mean this script?
> > >
> > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
> > >
> > > Note: It may be named the same as sa-stats.pl, but it is different.
Per
> > > rule based.
> > >
> > > Another Dallas miracle!
> >
> > Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham or spam? It "looks
like"
> > it is rather random based on the reports. BAYES_99 may well hit on
84.33%
> > of spam. But I doubt, given it's score, it hits on 44.53% of ham.
>
> BTW, it might be quite helpful to rename that script, since there's
> already an "sa-stats.pl" in the 'tools' dir -- as follows:
>
> NAME
> sa-stats.pl - Builds received spam/ham report from mail log
>
> VERSION
> $Revision: 1.17 $
>
> SYNOPSIS
> Usage: sa-stats.pl [options]
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> Creates simple text report of spam/ham detected by SpamAssassin by pars-
> ing spamd entries in the mail log (generally /var/log/maillog)
That one is terminally broken. I had to install a perl module that
was not on my system. Once I did it reported all zeros.
I did make a change to the sa-stats.pl on the SARE site. It now works
quite nicely. (It was reporting nonsense for a couple of the values. Now
it reports something useful in that formerly nonsense slot.)
{^_^}
