Herb, this is just FYI. I am *NOT* sending from a fake Yahoo server - this mail was legit, so seems like your server is being a little over-zealous?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 17 Aug 2005 23:16:08 -0000 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: failure notice > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 68.178.144.61 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 Fake Yahoo mail > Giving up on 68.178.144.61. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 69465 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Aug 2005 23:16:02 -0000 > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; > s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; > > h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; > > b=kFeUKnrDxm4Y+XJNGAjmiKk5ZWlKlRIwiDc4zVNhgR4CyXMc/1LVYUdp+By5RVeAggd2+s0RB2WJIbrG+yE8PxHHW+1BqYEtK+MMxJUkTh49JFhGn0NEWiKgHcDmqS06AYxSsU3U+itOkbDn+2aLfIkMKzRdoPfAztHWnEMdiIQ= > ; > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from [64.171.185.165] by web51909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, > 17 Aug 2005 16:16:02 PDT > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT) > From: email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: BIND with "forward first" as caching DNS? > To: Herb Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, users@spamassassin.apache.org > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > --- Herb Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'm no DNS expert, so am wondering if I am shooting myself > > > in the foot by having "forwarders" set up in my BIND config > > > file, especially with "forward > > > first": > > > > > Where xxx and yyy are the DNS servers for my colo provider > > > where I host the system in question. Does this defeat the > > > purpose of local caching or am I OK? > > > > No. Resolution by forwarders is also cached by > > the requesting (forwarding) DNS server. > > > > It does expose you to any corruption (e.g., cache > > polution) of your colocator's DNS -- but if you > > trust them to do as good or better job of running > > DNS securely (than you can do) then that probably > > doesn't matter. (You did say you are not an expert.) > > Thank you! > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
