On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 10:19 -0700, Robert Menschel wrote: > > JH> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=13.7 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_20_30, > JH> HTML_MESSAGE,MANGLED_LOOK,SARE_HTML_P_MANY3,SARE_RAND_2, > JH> SARE_RECV_IP_218216,SARE_SUB_ENC_ISO2022JP,SARE_SUB_PCT_LETTER, > JH> SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.4 > > JH> Unfortunately at the time I had left included in our site-wide > JH> configuration some of the specific 'ENG' SARE rules, so that explains > JH> the SARE_SUB_ENC_ISO2022JP matching and bumping the score up a bit. The > JH> SARE_RECV_IP_218216 is also a bit worrying (the message may have passed > JH> through a known spam relay). > > If you're using the latest SARE version, SARE_RECV_IP_218216 should be > scoring only 0.964, because we have detected ham coming through that > range of servers (though spam:ham > 100:1). If you can send me some > confirmed ham (full emails, headers and all), I can add those to my > corpus and that will help drive the score down. > [snipped]
Hello, Many thanks, and to Matt Kettler, for your suggestions about this. I have now removed the specific ENG rules, and the mangled.cf. Unfortunately I cannot send you a copy of the message itself since I do not have it. I have asked the student for a copy of the full message, but so far have received nothing. Thanks, John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839
