The nasty part is that you pretty much have to generate a per user
rule for this. I don't think a rule can expand things like $USER.
I have a rule for somebody at earthlink. I have a rule for me at
earthlink. I have a rule for several generic people at earthlink.
If it is to me and has fewer than N earthlink recipients listed
the rule does not trigger. (And given the realities of life on the
Internet as I experience it this is not a rule scored high enough
to kick out spam all by itself.)
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bart Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 9/16/05, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are better off to use a normal SpamAssassin meta rule.
How so? SA doesn't know how to interpret "not to me" (unless I write
a plugin) -- it has no built-in knowledge of, for example, all
possible sendmail aliases for my personal account -- and individual
users can't add their own rules, so the only way I can code a custom
expression to match all my personal addresses is to do it outside of
SA.
I suppose it would be possible to write a "blacklist_not_to" rule as a
plugin, but procmail is doing it just fine, thanks.
