> On Donnerstag, 22. September 2005 22:24 email builder wrote: > > How so? I can't believe you don't hear me when I say for the 100th > > time that services like ours that have a lot of users who expect to > > communicate with hotmail users cannot use an RBL in the MTA if it > > lists hotmail. > > Larry said it already: > > There are RCVD_IN_SORBS_* rules in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf for each of the > > various SORBS lists. The ones for RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM are commented > > out. > > We're also having lots of customers communicating with hotmail.com, > didn't get a report of problems for months. Just pick the "right" > rules. If the RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM doesn't fit you, don't activate it, > it's disabled by default (I guess for a reason...).
No. Please understand that there is a difference between using SORBS in the MTA (ala Postfix's smtpd_recipient_restrictions) where a listing equates to an immediate rejection and using SORBS in SA for scoring. You are referring to the latter. I have said many times that the thread was about the former. I don't think anyone disagrees with using SORBS in SA scoring. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
