> -----Original Message----- > From: Dawn Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Anyone seeing this FP? > > > > I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT > header and Messege > > ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy? > > By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date > and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The > Message-ID > SHOULD be present (section 3.6.4) and is in common practice added by > the first "real" mail server the message hits if the client software > did not put one on (RFC 2821 section 6.3 "Compensating for > Irregularities"). > > Producing a message containing neither Subject nor Message-ID headers > is not polite, but is not technically broken behaviour. > > --d
Thanks all. A ninja gave me a nice meta to deal with the FP. Wanted to know the RFC before I went ahead and asked Sprint to fix. I guess I won't bother. --Chris
