Thanks Martin,
It is a Dell 2850 2.4 Ghz with 2.0 GB ram. I never thought about
how the RBL's are called.
Shane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin vs spamd
> Shane
>
> In that case, from my understanding of amavis-new, your stuck with the
way
> it works. As far as I know amavis-new calls SA from the perl API, like
> MailScanner does. Best way is to look at why the load is so high.
>
> Maybe your calling ALL the RBL's from SA rather than just a few.
>
> Also you mention how much RAM you have, what CPU it's running on...
>
> I'd ask the amavis-new folks about SA tuning from their point of view.
>
> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 October 2005 16:31
> To: Martin Hepworth
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Spamassassin vs spamd
>
> Thanks Martin,
>
> We use amavis-new.
>
> Shane
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:20 AM
> Subject: RE: Spamassassin vs spamd
>
>
> > Shane
> >
> > Depends on how you are call spamassassin???? Milter, amavis-new,
> > MailScanner.....
> >
> > --
> > Martin Hepworth
> > Snr Systems Administrator
> > Solid State Logic
> > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: shane mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 11 October 2005 16:17
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Spamassassin vs spamd
> >
> > Is anyone here running spamd? We use Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several
> SARE
> > rules. Now that our primary MX server handles about 20k emails a
day,
> cpu
> > usage stays over 90 % and load average is between 5 and 6. I was
> wondering
> > how much faster spamd is?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shane
> >
> >
> >
> >
**********************************************************************
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
> > for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
> >
> >
**********************************************************************
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
>
