Hello,
I finally got the point of what is wrong with the mail I was dealing with.
=== Received headers
Received: from mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr)
by mwinb0504 (SMTP Server) with LMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:36 +0200
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B223EA00014D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Test (APuteaux-116-1-6-180.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr
[193.251.71.180])
by mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4FFBFA0001B3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:23
+0200 (CEST)
=== Received headers
Notice the destination of the 1st hop and the origin of the second hop (which
is by chance the same host :-).
I changed it by the more classical received format host:
mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30])
And this time, the mail doesn't trigger RCVD_IN_[SORBS|NJABL]_DUL
For info, here are the complete modified received headers :
=== Modified Received headers
Received: from mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr)
by mwinb0504 (SMTP Server) with LMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:36 +0200
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30])
with ESMTP id B223EA00014D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Test (APuteaux-116-1-6-180.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr
[193.251.71.180])
by mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) with
ESMTP id 4FFBFA0001B3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:49:23
+0200 (CEST)
=== Modified Received headers
In the debug trace, I can see that SA submits to the different RBL servers
just the origin of the post in the first case. In the second case, it submits
also the smtp server mwinf0107.wanadoo.fr.
In my opinion, it is bug. Should I fill a bug report?
Thanks for your answers.
Jérôme Mainka
Antidot
