In an older episode (Wednesday, 2. November 2005 12:11), Simon Hogg wrote: > Folks, we've been using SpamAssassin as part of MailScanner for just > over a year with no problems at all.
> We have the threshold set at 6 for spam, but this scores 100.00 on IE_VULN. > > Can it be that the content of the file is being mistaken for something > else? I've found no reference to IE_VULN in any of the FAQ's, mail > archives, google (except one reference to the same score), hence my > posting to this list. IE_VULN does not appear to be a rule that is contained within spamassassin 3.0.4 or any of the SARE rules we are using. Is that part of some custom local rule of yours? cheers, wolfgang
