>...
>Just received the below crap in from Anna Eshoo in my inbox.
>
>Funny, I don't see a e-mail address on my representatives website.
>And there's no MX record for house.gov.
>Header below, full SPAM at
>http://www.espphotography.com/eshoo.html or
>http://www.espphotography.com/eshoo.txt
>
>Anna will definitely have some explaining to do if she wants my vote
>the next time she comes up for election.
>
>Anyone have a e-mail address for representatives? Or a format?
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>Thanks.
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from vmta-35.listrak.com (vtma-35.listrak.com [66.109.242.35])
> by espphotography.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0B4243730
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:45:17 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by vmta-35.listrak.com id he91s6067ncn; Wed, 9 Nov 2005
>13:45:10 -0500 (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>From: "Rep. Anna Eshoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: News & Views, Fall 2005
>Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:45:05 -0500
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mailer: Listrak
>X-Mailer-Server: T4
>X-Mailer-Thread: 7
>X-SMTP-Server: 192.168.1.233
>X-Mailer-Reference: 11317-4025210-301012-30661
>X-UMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="--=6AD0BE6FCB504120B5DD_10AF_92D6_2AD0"
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
> www.espphotography.com
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,DEAR_FRIEND,
> EXCUSE_10,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMAILTH,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMLRSRV,
> SARE_HEAD_HDR_XSMTPSV,SARE_HEAD_HDR_XUMAIL,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL
> autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>Status:
>
% host -t mx mail.house.gov
mail.house.gov mail is handled by 20 gemini.house.gov.
mail.house.gov mail is handled by 20 hydrus.house.gov.
mail.house.gov mail is handled by 20 perseus.house.gov.
i.e. the "Reply-To:" line is valid - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Message-ID and leaking the RFC1918 IP address are just bad IT
management, you can't blame her for that; But for political "spam" (assuming
it wasn't personalized or signed up for), you could report it to the FTC and
"Cc" her office. And then there is sending it via a commercial service whose
contact telephone number is 999 999 9999 (i.e. listrak.com) is probably not
very wise for a goverment representative (Their *real* telephone number would
seem to be 717 627-6080).
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
