Use "all_spam_to" instead of "whitelist_to".
Thijs Koetsier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running spamassassin 3.0.4 on Debian-exim.
In my /etc/spamassassin/whitelist.cf I've this line:
whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today, this user recieved an e-mail marked as spam with the following
header:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:47:18 +0100
Received: from Debian-exim by _my.mailserver.nl _with spam-scanned (Exim
4.52)
id 1Ebavm-0006E7-9j
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Nov
2005 10:47:18 +0100
Received: from localhost by _my.mailserver.nl_
with SpamAssassin (version 3.0.4);
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:47:18 +0100
From: "pmec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Subject: {Spam} November's New Training Programs
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:47:47 +0200
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
_my.mailserver.nl_
X-Spam-Level: ***********
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DOMAIN_RATIO,
FAKE_HELO_MAIL_COM_DOM,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,
FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=no version=3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_43785D26.1D7B5742"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Does anyone know why this message wasn't whitelisted, which it should have?
Thanks in advance,
Thijs
--
Steve
