In an older episode (Thursday, 24. November 2005 10:42), Jeremy wrote: > That's beause my MTA does it's own DNSBL checks, so I don't need the > multitude of additional DNSBL checks that SA does.
If I am not mistaken, SA's DNSBL checks will also score mails that have passed thru some listed host on the way to your MTA. So they would catch mails that blocking at the MTA level will not catch. If your system resources allow it, I would suggest to use DNSBL checks anyway. cheers, wolfgang