Jdow wrote on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:39:42 -0800: > No, that is an improper assumption.
Well, if you do a little more research and go to SORBS and check that IP you see that it's been in the db since June! If you do even more research and query all known RBLs you find that it's been in NJABL since 2003! So, this looks more like this actually *may have been* a DUL range and only recently used for servers. So, it's Earthlink's fault. And if it's not the case and these servers (despite their *inbound* name being *outbound* nameservers which is not very smart) have been on these IPs for long then it's even more the fault of Earthlink and probably reflects their attitude how they care about their customers and others in the business. They had long enough time to get removed. BTW: I recently see "bottom posting" taking on in newsgroups for no good reason. In this thread I had to scroll down the whole dig output for the two last postings to read the reply. Is it really so hard to do others a favor and trim the quote down? Please, no discussion, just think about it, thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
