Title: RE: A thought about phone numbers and URIBLs


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 9:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: A thought about phone numbers and URIBLs
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I was bored, so I knocked together rules for every
> international dialing
> code. They are first-pass, very rough but (with the exception
> of the USA
> and Canada rules hitting some dodgy message-id's) have a 100% accuracy
> rate against my corpus. They might make a useful building block for
> others...
>
> Note that this means they seem to hit where they should, so
> LOCAL_P_USA
> should hit any USA number formed +1\d{4,10} (so will LOCAL_P_CANADA),
> LOCAL_P_DOMINICAN_REPUBLIC should hit anything +1809\d{3,10}
> and so on...
>
> The rules are a bit big to post to the list, so if anyone wants them,
> they're at http://fukka.co.uk/sa-rules/local/phone_rules.cf
>
> C.

I'll try to have a look at these today. SARE has:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#evilnumbers

Based on the old style bigevil. SARE dosen't put all numbers in there, just the major runs of spam.

--Chris

Reply via email to