J. TOUIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How stop this new spam !
> No URL, no texte, only image !
> Only DNSBL could be use on it...
>
First, that email message was slightly corrupted. The headers are missing.
Second, there's plenty of text in that message. However, it's using HTML tags to
make the text invisible. You'll have to view the message source to see the,
That said, my SA 3.1.0 had *NO* problem at all tearing this email up.
Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
2.3 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Message body has many words used only once
1.9 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of words
1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80%
[score: 0.6489]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
2.7 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority, but no user agent name
3.8 LONGWORDS Long string of long words
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received header
You can ignore the NO_RELAYS and NO_RECEIVED, as those are artifacts of your
attachment not having all the headers.
Still, UNIQUE_WORDS and LONGWORDS should have both fired off if you're using SA
3.1.0, racking up well over 6.0 points.
What results did YOUR SA get for this message?
