Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +0000, Justin Mason wrote: > > yes, I'm a little worried about that, too. > So from these results, the FP rate is very low for SURBL (0.21%), and > while there is a ton of overlap for spam (57.3%), there's very little > for ham (0.01%).
aha, that's very interesting! --j.
