Sorry, I am in the habit of 'reply' as opposed to 'reply all'.
I see no 'obvious' errors in spamassassin -D --lint which was the first
thing I checked.
Shortly before you asked about the 'sa-learn --dump magic', I found this
message from Matt:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-users&m=113327783327806&w=2
I did this and now I'm seeing bayes markups. So hopefully it was just a
perms issue that is now resolved.
Thanks,
Mike
Steven Stern wrote:
M. Lewis wrote:
Thanks Steve,
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 57468 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 16419 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 181931 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1139892654 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1140583854 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal
sync atime
0.000 0 1140584727 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 691200 0 non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000 0 1510 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
Please keep replies on the list
I was wondering if you'd had enough ham and spam to get past the
minimums. Looks like you have.
How about posting the output from
spamassassin -D --lint
--
Those who can, do. Those who cannot, teach. Those who cannot teach,
HACK!
00:30:01 up 3 days, 35 min, 6 users, load average: 0.54, 0.60, 0.58
Linux Registered User #241685 http://counter.li.org
