Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:58:52PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > >>Ok, does anyone have *recent* statistical analysis (i.e. not almost a >>year old) >>on this? It could be that the people using this "boneheaded" construct have >>realized the error of their ways, and stopped doing it. >> >> > >Unfortunately not. I updated the ticket >(http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4255) with new >stats and a plugin that implements the check so people can play with it. >The best version was comparing domains: > > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 0 28446 5023 0.850 0.00 0.00 (all messages) >0.00000 84.9921 15.0079 0.850 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) > 0.302 0.3340 0.1195 0.737 0.00 0.01 T_HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH > >If people want to play with the plugin and can improve the hit rate to >a usable level (or if you find a bug in the code), please let us know! >But otherwise this rule sucks pretty badly. :( > > > Hmm. Thanks. Trying out the attachment, but having issues. Using 3.1.0 on FC3 Linux.
Updated the bug. -Philip
