Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3210 > > I'd actually use attachment 3212 -- the one we applied to, and tested > against, the 3.1 branch. > > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3312
Oops. That's what I get for linking to the attachment rather than the bug. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
