On Montag, 3. April 2006 14:34 Lars Ringh wrote: > Now, since in each case the source data can come from two different > servers scanning the same kind of mails, should I try to merge the > bayes-data from servers home1 and home2 into the the same myqsl-db > and then merge the data from corp1 and corp2 into the other mysql-db, > or should I pick my starting sourcedata from only one server in each > pair? Would spamassassin benefit from having the greater source to > look at, or would I only be adding close-to-identical data which > would then only be expired faster than it was to merge them?
I believe you should *not* mix two different bayes DBs. Use just one, and the rest will fill up with the next SPAM jumping in... > 165MB...335MB Did you not bayes_auto_expire? mf gzmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie // http://zmi.at Tel: 0660/4156531 Linux 2.6.11 // PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi2.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: EB93 ED8A 1DCD BB6C F952 F7F4 3911 B933 7054 5879 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x70545879
pgp31Y4BHbf1y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
