On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:53:56PM -0500, Jacob Hoppe wrote: > I am running sa for Outlook which states in the email that the sa is > v2.3. Is the output at the top of this email message correct? I
Wow. That's ancient! > thought its supposed to test for other items...Please let me know > what you think...It seems the points that are accumulated are all good > items?? I have no idea what SA for Outlook is, but I have some comments. > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.0 required=5.0 > tests=__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MIME_VERSION,__HAS_X_MAILER,__HAS_RCVD, > __HAS_SUBJECT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__MSGID_OK_HEX,__CT, > __EUDORA_MUA,__ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA,__MSGID_OK_HOST, > __NONEMPTY_BODY > version=2.31 SA 2.31 had no concept of a subtest, and therefore had no tests starting with "__". So my guess is that you have an ancient version of SA (2.31 is over 3 years old!) with some newer rules, which is likely not going to work exactly as planned. For instance, 2.31 considers all of those as valid rules and gives each one 1 point. Things like meta rules, which would use the subtests, didn't exist either. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "> I'm an idiot.. At least this [bug] took about 5 minutes to find.. We need to find some new terms to describe the rest of us mere mortals then." - Craig Schlenter in response to Linus Torvalds about a kernel bug.
pgprGQYW9ZCkD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
