On Sunday 21 May 2006 1:52 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > I've got an FN that showed up in my inbox, the above tag with -15 for a
> > score is keeping it from being tagged as spam. I've ran spamassassin -R
> > and spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist=
>
> That command only affects the AWL. It does not affect the real
> whitelists.
>
> >  however the its still got the
> > tag.  Where is the default whitelist and how can I remove this address?
>
> it's in /usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf.
>
> Also, if your false-positive is a forged email, make sure your
> trusted_networks is set properly. If SA is mis-trusting headers, it may
> cause whitelist_from_rcvd type rules to match for forgeries.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
>
> Note: that page mentions whitelist_from_rcvd not matching as a symptom..
> this is true, but trust path problems can also go the other way and
> cause it to match more than it should.
>
>
>  I would also suggest that if there is an entry there that's causing you
> problems, and it's not caused by mis-parsing, let us know about it.

Matt, here are the headers of the message:

X-Spam-Virus: No
 X-Spam-Seen: Tokens 102
 X-Spam-New: Tokens 265
 X-Spam-Remote: Host localhost.localdomain
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 
        cpollock.localdomain
 X-Spam-Hammy: Tokens 4
 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,
        RCVD_IN_XBL,RM_t_bobbf,SORTED_RECIPS,SPF_FAIL,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS,
        UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled 
        version=3.1.0
 X-Spam-Spammy: Tokens 34
 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
 X-Spam-Token: Summary Tokens: new, 163; hammy, 4; neutral, 64; spammy, 34.
 X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu cpollock 1201; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=many
 X-Spam-Untrusted: Relays [ ip=200.8.7.99 rdns=mailer.whitehat.com 
        helo=mailer.whitehat.com by=mx-roseate.atl.sa.earthlink.net ident= 
        envfrom= intl=0 id=1fHL0V28i3Nl34f0 auth= ]
 X-Spam-Level: **
 X-Spam-RBL: Results <dns:99.7.8.200.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org> [127.0.0.4]
        <dns:mailer.whitehat.com?type=MX> [5 mailer.whitehat.com.]
        <dns:mailer.whitehat.com> [204.74.75.15]
 Status: U
 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Received: from pop.earthlink.net [209.86.93.201]
        by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 21 May 2006 05:20:08 
-0500 (CDT)
 Received: from mailer.whitehat.com ([200.8.7.99])
        by mx-roseate.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP 
id 1fHL0V28i3Nl34f0; Sun, 21 May 2006 06:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
 Received: from smtp.endend.nl ([Mon, 22 May 2006 06:02:50 +0200])
        by relay.2yahoo.com with NNFMP; Mon, 22 May 2006 06:02:50 +0200
 Received: from Mon, 22 May 2006 05:48:33 +0200 ([Mon, 22 May 2006 05:48:33 
+0200]) by relay-x.misswldrs.com with SMTP; Mon, 22 May 2006 05:48:33 +0200
 Received: from external.newsubdomain.com ([Mon, 22 May 2006 05:34:14 
+0200])
        by qrx.quickslick.com with NNFMP; Mon, 22 May 2006 05:34:14 +0200
 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Reply-To: "Blythe Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 From: "Bethann Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: "Ashlyn J Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Annalee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Alline Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Yuko N Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Vella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Trang Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Towanda B Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: loads of players online, win big
 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 05:24:09 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="windows-1252"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
 X-ELNK-Info: spv=1;
 X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;
 X-SenderIP: 200.8.7.99
 X-ASN: ASN-21826
 X-CIDR: 200.8.6.0/23
 X-UID: 1
 X-Length: 3728

As you can see "Received: from mailer.whitehat.com" matches the entry in 
60_whitelist.cf:

def_whitelist_from_rcvd  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     
whitehat.com

I suppose thats where that tag came from. I have raised the score on the 
RM_t_bobbf from 3.0 to 10.0 for now which raised the score on this message 
to above the 5.0 threshold.

-- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
21:17:11 up 7 days, 9:17, 2 users, load average: 1.48, 0.80, 0.58
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk

Attachment: pgpMDkxzeiGYY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to