Spam detection software, running on the system "DEDE143", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
Contact Wayne for details.
Content preview: Hi Sandy, I tried to and I kept getting an error when
attempting to join. It kept telling me communication error so I figured
I would wait until later to see if it was an issue on my end or on their
end. [...]
Content analysis details: (7.3 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
0.1 HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag
1.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.6 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM DNS: Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[68.56.253.77 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[68.56.253.77 listed in combined.njabl.org]
-1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
--- Begin Message ---
|
Hi Sandy,
I tried to and I kept getting an error when attempting to join. It kept telling me communication error so I figured I would wait until later to see if it was an issue on my end or on their end.
Wayne
-------Original Message-------
Date: 06/03/06 20:09:26
Subject: Re[2]: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
> I have talked to the SM tech support and have searched through their
> forum but they believe this is SA issue.
P.S. You didn't start *a new thread* on their forum, which is as much
community-supported as vendor-supported. This is not being thorough,
for what seems like an urgent issue.
--Sandy
.
|
 |
--- End Message ---
