Don't know... Been using Oracle and MSSQL for years. Both of those work fine. Don't understand the argument. Why use Postgres when I can just piggy back them on my replicated Oracle environment.
If we are talking about making a SQL application that is usable for a multitude of people then why lock them into something. That's the easiest way to drive them away from supporting it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:21 PM > To: Gary W. Smith > Cc: Marc Perkel; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: The Future of Email is SQL > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:16:10PM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote: > > It's getting there, albeit slowly. I think that if you rule out any up > > and coming application but it's just not there yet we wouldn't have an > > opensource community... > > > > We have a variety of reasons for using MySQL, most of them aren't good > > ones though but it's something we've been able to work with for some > > time. > > Why would you deal with the short-commings when you could just use > PostgreSQL, SQLite, or even Innobase? > -- > Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 > > Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" > Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" > FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
